Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Renewed warnings of suffocation risk from infant sleep positioners | Synopsis

Renewed warnings of suffocation risk from infant sleep positioners

Excerpt:

This 2010 image from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) shows the potential suffocation hazard for babies who are placed in infant sleep positioners.  / CPSC. gov Infant sleep positioners have been marketed and sold as ways to improve a baby's sleep, while reducing risk for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). A new report however from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention finds the products have caused 13 suffocation deaths in young infants since 1997. Breast-feeding tied to lower risk of sudden infant death syndrome Study: Sudden Infant Death Syndrome rates down, but more risk factors emerge Unintentional suffocation is the leading cause of injury death for U.S. children younger than 1-year-old, according to the CDC.

People:

Michelle Bolek

Overall Sentiment: 0.166905

Relevance: 0.319767

SentimentQuote
0.334572"Using an infant sleep positioner would be at the discretion of a health care professional for a specific medical condition," FDA spokeswomen Michelle Bolek said ...
0.169904"Using an infant sleep positioner would be at the discretion of a health care professional for a specific medical condition," FDA spokeswomen Michelle Bolek said to HealthDay. "For example, a baby with cerebral palsy who has difficulty swallowing may need a positioner to sleep. These babies are not likely to roll off the device because they do not move normally as a result of their disability."
Sentiment Stats:
  • Number of Quotes: 2
  • Aggregate Sentiment: 0.504476
  • Mean: 0.252238
  • Standard Deviation: 1.7320508075689

Key:

  • Aggregate Sentiment is meant to be an indicator of an individual's overall sentiment.
  • The Mean is meant to be an indicator of an individual's average comment sentiment.
  • The Standard Deviation, when there are enough quotes, will indicate an individual's consistency of sentiment (i.e. a Standard Deviation of 0 would mean they were very consistent in their sentiment and 1 would mean they were very inconsistent).

Note that quote stats are likely to be meaningless beyond the aggregate score due to the tiny sample size. However, they are always provided just in case you find something useful there.

Additional Info:

FieldTerminology: SIDS

Overall Sentiment: 0

Relevance: 0.668521

FieldTerminology: ISP

Overall Sentiment: -0.0732791

Relevance: 0.387393

HealthCondition: cerebral palsy

Overall Sentiment: -0.0717363

Relevance: 0.366577

Disambiguation: DiseaseOrMedicalCondition | Disease | MedicalSpecialtyReferences:

Organization: CDC

Overall Sentiment: -0.121471

Relevance: 0.805631

Organization: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

Overall Sentiment: -0.188113

Relevance: 0.627394

Organization: U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Overall Sentiment: 0.133417

Relevance: 0.584036

Organization: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Overall Sentiment: -0.205153

Relevance: 0.445676

Organization: American Academy of Pediatrics

Overall Sentiment: 0

Relevance: 0.325497

Organization: AAP

Overall Sentiment: -0.0576962

Relevance: 0.30898

Country: U.S.

Overall Sentiment: -0.24162

Relevance: 0.438068

Disambiguation: Location | Region | AdministrativeDivision | GovernmentalJurisdiction | FilmEditorReferences:
Tags Info

No comments:

Post a Comment